Loading…

Substituted Thiols in Dynamic Thiol–Thioester Reactions

The thiol–thioester reaction has emerged as a promising method for developing covalent adaptable networks (CANs) due to its ability to exchange rapidly under low temperature conditions in a number of solvents, orthogonality among other functional groups, and tunability. Here, the effects of thiol su...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Macromolecules 2021-09, Vol.54 (18), p.8341-8351
Main Authors: Bongiardina, Nicholas J, Long, Katelyn F, Podgórski, Maciej, Bowman, Christopher N
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The thiol–thioester reaction has emerged as a promising method for developing covalent adaptable networks (CANs) due to its ability to exchange rapidly under low temperature conditions in a number of solvents, orthogonality among other functional groups, and tunability. Here, the effects of thiol substitution (i.e., primary vs secondary) were assessed with respect to their reactivity in two dynamic thioester reactions: the thiol–thioester exchange and the reversible thiol–anhydride addition. Model NMR experiments were conducted using small-molecule compounds to observe how polymers of similar components would behave in thiol–thioester exchange. It was determined that the K eq was near unity for mixtures of primary thiols and secondary thioesters, and vice versa, in both a polar solvent, DMSO-d 6, and at most slightly favors primary thioesters in a relatively nonpolar solvent, CDCl3. Dielectric spectroscopy and stress relaxation experiments were used to determine the relaxation times and activation energies of the two thioester-containing networks: Thiol-ene networks, which undergo thioester exchange, displayed activation energies of 73 and 71 kJ/mol from dielectric measurements and 36 and 53 kJ/mol from stress relaxation for the primary and secondary thiols, respectively. Thiol–anhydride-ene networks, which undergo both thioester exchange and reversible thiol–anhydride addition, displayed activation energies of 94 and 114 kJ/mol from dielectric and 111 and 139 kJ/mol from stress relaxation for primary and secondary thiols, respectively. In both types of networks, the secondary thioester-based networks demonstrated slower dynamics as compared to the same primary network by at least one order of magnitude. In the anhydride network, the secondary thiol also biased the dynamics toward reversible addition.
ISSN:0024-9297
1520-5835
DOI:10.1021/acs.macromol.1c00649