Loading…

Analysis of Free and Esterified Ergosterol in Tomato Products

A new extraction and chromatographic procedure to quantify free and esterified ergosterol in tomato products was devised. The extraction solution was composed of a dichloromethane/methanol mixture in a 2:1 (v/v) ratio. This extraction solvent allowed for higher ergosterol recovery from tomato produc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2000-03, Vol.48 (3), p.780-784
Main Authors: de Sio, Francesco, Laratta, Bruna, Giovane, Alfonso, Quagliuolo, Lucio, Castaldo, Domenico, Servillo, Luigi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A new extraction and chromatographic procedure to quantify free and esterified ergosterol in tomato products was devised. The extraction solution was composed of a dichloromethane/methanol mixture in a 2:1 (v/v) ratio. This extraction solvent allowed for higher ergosterol recovery from tomato products (an average of 25% more) compared to hexane, which is frequently employed for ergosterol extraction. Both free and esterified ergosterol were determined by HPLC reverse-phase chromatography employing a Nova-Pak C-18 column (300 × 3.9 mm), filled with 4 mm average particle size and a guard column of the same material. The elution was performed at a flow rate of 1 mL·min-1 with a linear gradient of solvent A (methanol/water, 80:20, v/v) and solvent B (dichloromethane). The gradient, starting at sample injection, was from 0 to 50% B for 20 min for the free ergosterol analysis and additional 15 min at 50% B to analyze the ergosterol esters. This technique has proven to be more sensitive for ergosterol determination than other reported chromatographic procedures. Moreover, ergosterol esters, extracted from various fungal sources, separated well and were easily quantified. Keywords: Ergosterol; tomato; fungal contamination; microbiological quality
ISSN:0021-8561
1520-5118
DOI:10.1021/jf990475d