Loading…

The Simplest Azabutadienes in Their N-Protonated Forms. Generation, Stability, and Cycloaddition Reactivity in the Gas Phase

The simplest azabutadienes, i.e. 1-aza-1,3-butadiene and 2-aza-1,3-butadiene, are generated in their N-protonated forms 1 and 2 via gas-phase dissociative electron ionization of allylamine and piperidine, respectively. Formation of 1 and 2 is suggested by simple dissociation mechanisms, and supporte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of organic chemistry 1998-07, Vol.63 (15), p.4889-4897
Main Authors: Augusti, Rodinei, Gozzo, Fabio C, Moraes, Luis Alberto B, Sparrapan, Regina, Eberlin, Marcos N
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The simplest azabutadienes, i.e. 1-aza-1,3-butadiene and 2-aza-1,3-butadiene, are generated in their N-protonated forms 1 and 2 via gas-phase dissociative electron ionization of allylamine and piperidine, respectively. Formation of 1 and 2 is suggested by simple dissociation mechanisms, and supported by high-accuracy G2 ab initio calculations, which show the ions to be stable, non-interconverting species. Whereas 1 and 2 are unreactive toward ethylene and cyclohexene, 2 reacts with alkenes activated by electron-donating (OC2H5), electron-withdrawing (CN, COCH3), and vinyl and phenyl substituents most likely by polar [4+ + 2] cycloaddition, as suggested by MS3 experiments and ab initio calculations. The cycloadduct of 2 with ethyl vinyl ether is unstable and dissociates promptly by ethanol loss; hence, net C2H2 addition occurs. This novel vinylation reaction is proposed as a potential structurally diagnostic test for both 2-azabutadienes and vinyl ethers. Isomer 1 is in general much less reactive, and abundant adducts are only formed in reactions with alkenes activated by electron-withdrawing substituents. In reactions of 1 and 2 with esters (methyl acetate and dimethyl carbonate), hydrogen-bridged ion−neutral complexes are formed as the most abundant and stable products, as suggested by the ab initio calculations. Acetone, fluoroacetone and acetonitrile form abundant adducts with both 1 and 2; however, the experimental and theoretical results on these adducts provide no clear structural information. Reactions of 1 with DMSO occur almost exclusively by proton transfer, whereas 2 forms an abundant complex with DMSO. Limited reactivity is observed for 1 and 2 with acetyl chloride and thionyl chloride; the minor products observed were those of either dissociative proton transfer or charge exchange. The distinctive reactivities of 1 and 2 with styrene, ethyl vinyl ether, and dimethyl sulfoxide contrast to their identical low energy CID behavior, and allow their straightforward differentiation in the gas phase.
ISSN:0022-3263
1520-6904
DOI:10.1021/jo9715433