Loading…
General model for N 2 O and N 2 gas emissions from soils due to dentrification
Observations of N gas loss from incubations of intact and disturbed soil cores were used to model N 2 O and N 2 emissions from soil as a result of denitrification. The model assumes that denitrification rates are controlled by the availability in soil of NO 3 ( e − acceptor), labile C compounds ( e...
Saved in:
Published in: | Global biogeochemical cycles 2000-12, Vol.14 (4), p.1045-1060 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Observations of N gas loss from incubations of intact and disturbed soil cores were used to model N
2
O and N
2
emissions from soil as a result of denitrification. The model assumes that denitrification rates are controlled by the availability in soil of NO
3
(
e
−
acceptor), labile C compounds (
e
−
donor), and O
2
(competing
e
−
acceptor). Heterotrophic soil respiration is used as a proxy for labile C availability while O
2
availability is a function of soil physical properties that influence gas diffusivity, soil WFPS, and O
2
demand. The potential for O
2
demand, as indicated by respiration rates, to contribute to soil anoxia varies inversely with a soil gas diffusivity coefficient which is regulated by soil porosity and pore size distribution. Model inputs include soil heterotrophic respiration rate, texture, NO
3
concentration, and WFPS. The model selects the minimum of the NO
3
and CO
2
functions to establish a maximum potential denitrification rate for particular levels of
e
−
acceptor and C substrate and accounts for limitation of O
2
availability to estimate daily N
2
+N
2
O flux rates. The ratio of soil NO
3
concentration to CO
2
emission was found to reliably (
r
2
=0.5) model the ratio of N
2
to N
2
O gases emitted from the intact cores after accounting for differences in gas diffusivity among the soils. The output of the ratio function is combined with the estimate of total N gas flux rate to infer N
2
O emission. The model performed well when comparing observed and simulated values of N
2
O flux rates with the data used for model building (
r
2
=0.50) and when comparing observed and simulated N
2
O+N
2
gas emission rates from irrigated field soils used for model testing (
r
2
=0.47). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0886-6236 1944-9224 |
DOI: | 10.1029/1999GB001225 |