Loading…

A parameter study of separation modes of adhering microcontacts

A finite element model was developed to study adhesion of elastic-plastic microcontacts in a previous investigation. An interesting result was the identification of two distinct separation modes, i.e. brittle and ductile separation. In the current study, that model is used to conduct a series of sim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied physics 2008-03, Vol.103 (6), p.064902-064902-9
Main Authors: Du, Yan, Adams, George G., McGruer, Nicol E., Etsion, Izhak
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A finite element model was developed to study adhesion of elastic-plastic microcontacts in a previous investigation. An interesting result was the identification of two distinct separation modes, i.e. brittle and ductile separation. In the current study, that model is used to conduct a series of simulations to determine the influence of four nondimensional parameters (including the maximum load parameter) on the contact and on the separation modes. The results show that the parameter S (the ratio of the theoretical stress to the hardness) and δ f ∕ δ c (representing the loading level) are the most important. Smaller S can only lead to brittle separation, while larger S can cause either separation mode depending on δ f ∕ δ c . Ductile separation is more likely to occur at smaller δ f ∕ δ c and brittle separation at greater δ f ∕ δ c . The transition between the two separation modes occurs at about S = 1.2 (for δ f ∕ δ c = 30 ) which corresponds to the theoretical stress for adhesion being 20% greater than the hardness. This result is qualitatively similar to the existing simplified analytical models, in that the adhesion energy, the hardness, and the loading level play important roles in the occurrence of ductile separation. However, there are important quantitative differences. Comparisons are also made with molecular dynamics simulations of a contact and with a fracture mechanics model of crack propagation.
ISSN:0021-8979
1089-7550
DOI:10.1063/1.2874434