Loading…

Experimental characterization of quasi static and shock wave behavior of porous aluminum

Experiments of quasi static hydrostatic and uniaxial strain compression, and of shock wave propagation performed on 9% and 17% porous aluminum are presented, analyzed, and compared. Quasi static experiments show the influence of coupling between void collapse and plasticity induced in the matrix on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied physics 1998-06, Vol.83 (11), p.5741-5749
Main Authors: Bonnan, Stephane, Hereil, Pierre-Louis, Collombet, Francis
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Experiments of quasi static hydrostatic and uniaxial strain compression, and of shock wave propagation performed on 9% and 17% porous aluminum are presented, analyzed, and compared. Quasi static experiments show the influence of coupling between void collapse and plasticity induced in the matrix on the material macroscopic behavior. The amount of pore compaction appears to be enhanced by the deviatoric stress component present in the uniaxial strain tests and not in the hydrostatic ones. The originality of the plate impact setup and its associated metrology [velocity interferometer system for any reflector (VISAR) interferometry and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) piezoelectric gages] exhibits also the influence of these local physical mechanisms on shock wave propagation in porous aluminum. More, the variations observed between the rise times of shocks seem to point out a preponderance of the dynamic effects (inertia or strain rate) over the material behavior. We observe indeed that the higher the stress in the material, the shorter the shock rise time. This point is confirmed by comparing quasi static and dynamic responses of porous aluminum. Comparison of these experimental results to numerical simulations should be interesting to prove or not this hypothesis.
ISSN:0021-8979
1089-7550
DOI:10.1063/1.367430