Nexus between rural nonfarm income and agricultural production in Bangladesh

Evidence from the rural livelihood literature shows that farm households in developing countries engage in nonfarm employment to supplement their household income. This raises the question of whether nonfarm income complements or competes with agricultural production due to a possible shift in farm...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied economics 2021-02, Vol.53 (10), p.1184-1199
Main Authors: Mondal, Ripon Kumar, Selvanathan, Eliyathamby A, Selvanathan, Saroja
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural production
Bangladesh
Developing countries
Economic analysis
Economic theory
Employment
Endogenous
Expenditures
farm household
Food production
Food security
Households
Labor
LDCs
Livelihood
Rural areas
rural nonfarm income
technical efficiency
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Evidence from the rural livelihood literature shows that farm households in developing countries engage in nonfarm employment to supplement their household income. This raises the question of whether nonfarm income complements or competes with agricultural production due to a possible shift in farm household labour to nonfarm employment. Using survey data, this study examines the impact of rural nonfarm income on farm households' agricultural production in Bangladesh. Applying the instrumental variable Tobit model, we find a nonlinear relationship between nonfarm income and total production expenditure as well as expenditures on major purchased inputs (equipment, seed, fertilizer, purchased labour). This indicates that when nonfarm income rises, production expenditure increases but at a decreasing rate. Furthermore, the endogenous stochastic frontier production model indicates that technical inefficiency in agricultural production decreases at an increasing rate when nonfarm income rises. Overall, the findings of this study suggest that nonfarm income exerts an income effect on agricultural production by reducing the liquidity constraint and intensifying major purchased inputs. Thus, introducing policies that would increase rural nonfarm income opportunities to rural households complements agricultural production. This would also lead to raised food production, ultimately leading to an increase in food availability as well as food security.
ISSN:0003-6846
1466-4283
DOI:10.1080/00036846.2020.1827138