Loading…
Grammar constrains acts of predication
Båve has argued that act-type theories of propositions entail unwanted ambiguity of sentences such as 'Donald loves Joan'. King has argued that act-type theories of propositions entail an unwanted abundance of propositions. I reply that a version of the act-type theory can avoid these obje...
Saved in:
Published in: | Inquiry (Oslo) 2021-10, Vol.ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), p.1-21 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Båve has argued that act-type theories of propositions entail unwanted ambiguity of sentences such as 'Donald loves Joan'. King has argued that act-type theories of propositions entail an unwanted abundance of propositions. I reply that a version of the act-type theory can avoid these objections. The key idea is that grammar constrains the acts that can be performed by the utterance of a sentence. I present enough of the details of this version of the act-type theory to show how it can be used to respond to Båve's and King's objections. I conclude that this is a promising way to develop the act-type theory of propositions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-174X 1502-3923 |
DOI: | 10.1080/0020174X.2021.1990793 |