Effects of riparian manipulation on stream communities in small streams: Two case studies

• Published in: New Zealand journal of marine and freshwater research 2009-06, Vol.43 (3), p.763-774
• Main Authors: Jowett, I.G., Richardson, J., Boubée, J.A.T.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anguilla; Anguilla dieffenbachii; cover; Freshwater; Galaxias maculatus; Gobiomorphus; instream habitat; macroinvertebrates; native fish; riparian vegetation; stream rehabilitation
• ISSN: 0028-8330; 1175-8805
• DOI: 10.1080/00288330909510040

The effects of riparian manipulation in New Zealand are described for two case studies, one a short-term study of the effects of the removal of riparian vegetation on fish, and the second, a long-term study of the effect of re-establishment of riparian vegetation on fish and benthic macro invertebrates. The first case study was an experiment carried out between November 2001 and May 2002. Overhanging bank vegetation and in-stream wood were removed from short reaches of a small pastoral stream that had intact riparian margins, resulting in a change in stream structure with the formation of shallow uniform runs rather than pool and riffle structures as in unmodified reaches. The removal of bank cover and consequential instream habitat changes reduced inanga (Galaxias maculatus) densities by a factor of four within months of vegetation removal, showing the importance of instream cover and habitat to inanga. Adult longfin eel (Anguilla dieffenbachii) also became less abundant in the cleared reaches, but elvers (Anguilla spp.) became more abundant. In the second case study, pastoral sections in two small streams draining from native forest catchments were restored in 1995/96 by planting riparian vegetation and preventing stock access. After 10 years, the restoration efforts had more than doubled the numbers of giant kokopu (G. argenteus) and redfin bullies (Gobiomorphus huttoni), slightly increased numbers of banded kokopu (G. fasciatus), and decreased shortfin eel (A. australis) numbers by about 40%. The macroinvertebrate communities changed so that they became more similar to those at upstream native forest reference sites. These two case studies show that riparian margins can influence the composition of the fish and macroinvertebrate communities in small streams through the effects on cover, instream habitat and probably water temperature. Riparian restoration was most effective for the fish species that use cover and pool habitat.