Loading…
Repositioning, not replacing, race: the case for concepts of descent-based difference
In this response to the very thoughtful critiques of our book, An Ugly Word: Rethinking Race in Italy and the United States, we advocate for a comparative sociological examination of race that, while acknowledging and documenting its enduring centrality, also explores alternative notions of ancestry...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ethnic and racial studies 2024-06, Vol.47 (8), p.1638-1646 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this response to the very thoughtful critiques of our book, An Ugly Word: Rethinking Race in Italy and the United States, we advocate for a comparative sociological examination of race that, while acknowledging and documenting its enduring centrality, also explores alternative notions of ancestry-based distinction. The framework that we propose for examining the full range of such "concepts of descent-based difference," rather than obscuring social scientists' comprehension of the enduring significance of whiteness or disregarding the role of race as a socio-political construct, serves to broaden and systematize our analysis. It facilitates a nuanced exploration of the perception and categorization of diverse groups in varied societies worldwide. We are also grateful for the critics' suggestions for further exploring our "race-conscious versus race-skeptic" binary and the public relevance of our research. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0141-9870 1466-4356 |
DOI: | 10.1080/01419870.2023.2282071 |