The rise and fall of the New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition: a tale of two discourses

The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition (NAFSN) was launched in 2012 by the G7 countries as a major initiative to fight hunger in Africa. It promised to raise 50 million people out of poverty over the next 10 years by brokering pro-market reforms and flows of private capital to African agri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Third world quarterly 2021-07, Vol.42 (8), p.1751-1769
Main Authors: Prášková, Dagmar Milerová, Novotný, Josef
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agriculture
Alliances
Commercialization
Critical theory
Discourse analysis
Discourses
Economic reform
food regimes
Food security
Hunger
Internet
Neoliberalism
New Alliance
Nutrition
Paradigms
Poverty
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition (NAFSN) was launched in 2012 by the G7 countries as a major initiative to fight hunger in Africa. It promised to raise 50 million people out of poverty over the next 10 years by brokering pro-market reforms and flows of private capital to African agriculture. However, it failed to fulfil its promises and disappeared quietly from the public arena before the end of the 10-year period. This article applies critical discourse analysis to official US and French documents to examine the rise and fall of the initiative by confronting the discourses of the NAFSN and food security in the official US and French documents. The USA was the leading country, whereas France was a reluctant supporter and withdrew in 2018. The US discourse strongly promoted the neo-productivist food security paradigm embedded in techno-optimist and neoliberal solutions. By contrast, French framing leaned towards the agroecology paradigm, admittedly combined with the smallholder commercialisation perspective, which is itself remarkable for discourse at such a high policy level. We relate these divergences to the dialectical contradictions in the current global food system in terms of the tensions within the corporate/neoliberal food regime. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1917355 .
ISSN:0143-6597
1360-2241
DOI:10.1080/01436597.2021.1917355