Cognitive Style and Individual Differences in EEG Alpha During Information Processing

Abstract When presented with a task, it was hypothesised that different people tend to process the same information in different ways, using different areas of the brain, depending upon their cognitive style. The study used 15 adult subjects, who received the computer-presented Cognitive Styles Anal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational psychology (Dorchester-on-Thames) 1997-03, Vol.17 (1-2), p.219-234
Main Authors: Riding, Richard J., Glass, Alan, Butler, Stuart R., Pleydell-Pearce, Christopher W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult Education
Associative Learning
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Style
Computer Assisted Testing
Educational Psychology
Educational Research
Foreign Countries
Higher Education
Learning Modalities
Learning Processes
Psychoeducational Methods
United Kingdom
Word Recognition
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract When presented with a task, it was hypothesised that different people tend to process the same information in different ways, using different areas of the brain, depending upon their cognitive style. The study used 15 adult subjects, who received the computer-presented Cognitive Styles Analysis to assess their positions on two basic cognitive style dimensions: the Wholist-Analytic and Verbal-Imagery. In a computer-presented task, subjects were asked to view words presented singly at a rate of two, five and 10 words/second and in pairs at five and 10 word-pairs/second and to press a key when a word appeared which was in a target conceptual category (e.g. a fruit). The task comprised eight 30-second trials. During the task, alpha band EEG was monitored at 15 locations. For the Wholist-Analytic style, Analytics had, over all tasks, lower alpha power relative to the Wholists at all locations, and particularly posteriorly. With the Verbal-Imagery dimension, there was style-hemisphere effect, with Verbalisers having relatively more suppression on the left posterior temporal location T5 compared to right T6, and Imagers having the reverse. These results justify further exploration of the cerebral basis of individual differences in cognitive style.
ISSN:0144-3410
1469-5820
DOI:10.1080/0144341970170117