Breaking the Fourth Wall: Reaching Beyond Observer/Performer Binaries in Studies of Teacher and Researcher Learning

Researcher-practitioner collaborations often stop short of engaging researchers and teachers in collectively negotiating the moment-to-moment improvizational decision-making of instructional practice when students are present. We consider the potential for learning at one boundary that often exists...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognition and instruction 2022-01, Vol.40 (1), p.126-147
Main Authors: Kavanagh, Sarah Schneider, Resnick, Alison Fox, Ghousseini, Hala, Gotwalt, Elizabeth Schiavone, Cordero-Siy, Eric, Kazemi, Elham, Dutro, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Classroom Communication
Collaboration
Cooperative Learning
Educational Researchers
Learning
Learning Processes
Partnerships in Education
Perspective Taking
Researchers
Student participation
Teacher Collaboration
Teaching
Teaching Methods
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Researcher-practitioner collaborations often stop short of engaging researchers and teachers in collectively negotiating the moment-to-moment improvizational decision-making of instructional practice when students are present. We consider the potential for learning at one boundary that often exists between researchers and practitioners as they collaborate on instructional practice: the boundary between performing-teaching and observing-teaching. We draw on performance studies to conceptualize this boundary as a fourth wall. Our analysis examines researcher-practitioner collaboration across four sites in which participants were learning together about the complex work of facilitating student discussion. We analyze how one boundary crossing routine provided opportunities for researchers and practitioners to interact at the boundary of the fourth wall during enactment of discussion-based instruction with students. To analyze episodes of this routine, we draw on conceptualizations of potential learning mechanisms of boundary crossing in research-practice partnerships. Our findings identify and describe the mechanisms for researcher/practitioner learning that arose when our participants crossed the boundary of the fourth wall: perspective taking, boundary spanning, and recognition of shared problem spaces. We argue that these learning mechanisms create potential for researchers and practitioners to wrestle with and learn about the challenges and opportunities within facilitation of student discussions.
ISSN:0737-0008
1532-690X
DOI:10.1080/07370008.2021.2010209