Conceptual Understanding of Causal Reasoning in Physics

College students often experience difficulties in solving physics problems. These difficulties largely result from a lack of conceptual understanding of the topic. The processes of conceptual learning reflect the nature of the causal reasoning process. Two major causal reasoning methods are the cova...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of science education 2006-10, Vol.28 (13), p.1601-1621
Main Authors: Hung, Woei, Jonassen, David H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Attribution Theory
College Science
College Students
Computation
Concept Formation
Educational research
Educational sciences
Influences
Introductory Courses
Learning Strategies
Logical Thinking
Methodology
Observation, experimentation
Physics
Problem Solving
Science Instruction
Scientific Concepts
Thinking Skills
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:College students often experience difficulties in solving physics problems. These difficulties largely result from a lack of conceptual understanding of the topic. The processes of conceptual learning reflect the nature of the causal reasoning process. Two major causal reasoning methods are the covariational and the mechanism-based approaches. This study was to investigate the effects of different causal reasoning methods on facilitating students' conceptual understanding of physics. 125 college students from an introduction physics class were assigned into covariational group, mechanism-based group, and control group. The results show that the mechanism-based group significantly outperformed the other two groups in solving conceptual problems. However, no significant difference was found in all three groups performance on solving computational problems. Speculation on the inconsistent performance of the mechanism-based group in conceptual and computational problem solving is given. Detailed analyses of the results, findings, and educational implications are discussed
ISSN:0950-0693
1464-5289
DOI:10.1080/09500690600560902