Power and positionality shape identity work during a science research apprenticeship for girls

The research apprenticeship is a situated form of learning that can be effective in connecting learners to science. It is commonly assumed that this pathway is characterised by power transitions from those positioned as experts to those positioned as novices, yet power and positionality during a res...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of science education 2021-07, Vol.43 (11), p.1880-1893
Main Authors: Carsten Conner, Laura D., Oxtoby, Laura E., Perin, Suzanne M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Apprenticeship
Apprenticeships
College School Cooperation
Communities of Practice
community of practice
Females
Gender Bias
Girls
High School Students
Identification (Psychology)
Identity
Mentoring
Mentors
Novices
Positionality
Power
Power Structure
Professional development
research apprenticeship
Scientific Research
Scientists
Sex Stereotypes
STEM Education
Stereotypes
Summer Programs
Teachers
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The research apprenticeship is a situated form of learning that can be effective in connecting learners to science. It is commonly assumed that this pathway is characterised by power transitions from those positioned as experts to those positioned as novices, yet power and positionality during a research apprenticeship have rarely been explicitly investigated. Using a qualitative approach, we explored this area in the context of a summer research apprenticeship for girls, involving primarily female scientist mentors. We found that scientist mentors positioned, and were positioned by, learners in three different ways, and that these positionalities were associated with different kinds of identity work among learners. Given stereotypical societal views of science that can be at odds with gendered identities, these patterns may be particularly consequential for girls. We discuss implications for teacher professional development, as well as future research directions.
ISSN:0950-0693
1464-5289
DOI:10.1080/09500693.2021.1940348