Investigating student reasoning about measurement uncertainty and ability to draw conclusions from measurement data in inquiry-based university physics labs

Measurement uncertainty is a key topic in the university physics laboratory curriculum. In this study, we investigate students' ability to draw conclusions from measurement data and reasoning about measurement uncertainty in inquiry labs. This investigation centres around a task where students...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of science education 2023-02, Vol.45 (3), p.223-243
Main Author: Wan, Tong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Ability
Ambiguity (Context)
College Science
College Students
Curricula
Data Analysis
Inquiry
Interviews
laboratory
Logical Thinking
Measurement
Paradigms
Physics
physics education
Polls & surveys
Protocol Analysis
reasoning
Science Experiments
Science Instruction
Science Laboratories
Students
Uncertainty
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Measurement uncertainty is a key topic in the university physics laboratory curriculum. In this study, we investigate students' ability to draw conclusions from measurement data and reasoning about measurement uncertainty in inquiry labs. This investigation centres around a task where students conclude whether measurements from two experiments that differ only by one setup agree or disagree. Surveys were administered in introductory physics courses before and after Workshop Physics instruction, which utilises an activity-based, guided-inquiry approach. Student reasoning was characterised using the point and set paradigms. Think-aloud interviews were conducted to gain deeper insights into students' interpretations of measurement uncertainty. The survey results showed that students tended to draw conclusions based on the means without appropriately accounting for uncertainty even if many recognised the need to evaluate uncertainty. The number of decimal places had no influence on students' ability to draw conclusions. After instruction, students' reasoning shifted from point toward set or mixed paradigm, but their ability to draw conclusions did not improve. During the interviews, students demonstrated sophisticated interpretations about measurement uncertainty and data analysis strategies they used. Students recognised measurement uncertainty is inevitable and were able to identify possible sources of uncertainty. We discuss implications for instruction around measurement uncertainty.
ISSN:0950-0693
1464-5289
DOI:10.1080/09500693.2022.2156824