Human resource practices and discrimination in South Africa: overcoming the apartheid legacy

While there is some level of isomorphism and convergence in HRM practices, country-specific differences remain, notwithstanding globalization and the influence of increasingly powerful multinationals. Much work has occurred on diversity management and cultural aspects of management in South Africa (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of human resource management 2002-11, Vol.13 (7), p.1105-1118
Main Authors: Horwitz, Frank M., Browning, Victoria, Jain, Harish, Steenkamp, Anton J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Business studies
Discrimination
Employment
Human Resource Practices
Human resources
Legislation
Pay Practices
Personnel management
Post-apartheid society
Skills
Skills Development
South Africa
Unfair Discrimination
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:While there is some level of isomorphism and convergence in HRM practices, country-specific differences remain, notwithstanding globalization and the influence of increasingly powerful multinationals. Much work has occurred on diversity management and cultural aspects of management in South Africa (SA). This analysis finds that local institutional context in labour relations and particularism in practices remain important, although the influence of convergent forces such as globalization, information technology and increased competition has become much more prominent in post-apartheid SA. Human resource practitioners in SA see the most important workplace challenges as performance improvement, employment equity, training and development and managing trade union expectations. This article critically evaluates the effects of recent legislative measures, particularly labour court and arbitration awards aimed at addressing the adverse impact of past unfair discrimination on pay practices and skills development. The latter are found to be interrelated, sensitive and difficult areas of discrimination in respect of legal proof.
ISSN:0958-5192
1466-4399
DOI:10.1080/09585190210131320