Authoritarian Cooptation of Civil Society: The Case of Belarus

In Belarus, a vibrant civil society coexisted for the better part of the past decade with a firmly entrenched autocracy in a depoliticised cooptation mode. Through cooptation, the energy of civil society was channelled from representing a threat to the regime into being its resource. However, the ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Europe-Asia studies 2022-01, Vol.74 (1), p.1-30
Main Authors: Astapova, Anastasiya, Navumau, Vasil, Nizhnikau, Ryhor, Polishchuk, Leonid
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Autocracy
Civil society
Cooptation
COVID-19
Economic crisis
Hostility
Pandemics
Presidential elections
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In Belarus, a vibrant civil society coexisted for the better part of the past decade with a firmly entrenched autocracy in a depoliticised cooptation mode. Through cooptation, the energy of civil society was channelled from representing a threat to the regime into being its resource. However, the capacity developed by civil society during this period of political inactivity was quickly redeployed for political purposes at the junction of economic crisis, the regime's failure to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic and the 2020 presidential election. After the 2020 mass protests, in which civil society played a pivotal role, the regime's attitude to civil society turned to suppression and hostility.
ISSN:0966-8136
1465-3427
DOI:10.1080/09668136.2021.2009773