Holding On and Letting Go: Making Sense of End-of-Life Care Decisions in Families

Making medical care decisions for a family member at the end of life is an emotional and complex experience for families. To understand how families make sense of this process, we used Relational Dialectics Theory (RDT) to analyze discourses around the struggle between holding on and letting go. Fro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Southern communication journal 2015-10, Vol.80 (5), p.353-364
Main Authors: Ohs, Jennifer E., Trees, April R., Gibson, Corinne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Communication
Decision making
Discourse analysis
Emotions
End of life
Families & family life
Health services
Palliative care
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Making medical care decisions for a family member at the end of life is an emotional and complex experience for families. To understand how families make sense of this process, we used Relational Dialectics Theory (RDT) to analyze discourses around the struggle between holding on and letting go. From in-depth interviews with individuals about their family communication during end-of-life (EOL) decision making, two overarching discursive contradictions in families' meaning making emerged: family members' wishes versus patient's wishes and emotionality versus rationality. These contradictions provide insight into how families make sense of EOL decisions, including the process of decision making and who makes or influences those decisions, which has implications for a family's healing after the loss of a family member.
ISSN:1041-794X
1930-3203
DOI:10.1080/1041794X.2015.1081979