"When Reparation Is Felt to Be Impossible": Persecutory Guilt and Breakdowns in Thinking and Dialogue about Race

This paper examines the problem of white liberal guilt from a Kleinian perspective, considering both the reparative potential of guilt in the depressive position, as well as the ways in which racial guilt can become diverted to an internal experience focused more on the self than on the harmed other...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychoanalytic dialogues 2020-09, Vol.30 (5), p.578-594
Main Author: Caflisch, Jane
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Reparations
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper examines the problem of white liberal guilt from a Kleinian perspective, considering both the reparative potential of guilt in the depressive position, as well as the ways in which racial guilt can become diverted to an internal experience focused more on the self than on the harmed other, inspiring ways of thinking and acting that have little to do with repair. Drawing especially from the Kleinian concept of persecutory guilt, which describes the form guilt can take "when reparation is felt to be impossible", I examine the consequences of white liberal guilt as expressed in the United States today. In particular, I argue that white liberal self-idealization and self-reproach - positions summarized as "this is not who we are" and "this is all that we are" - can function as two sides of a coin, grounded in splitting and in divergent yet related forms of exceptionalism. As an alternative, I propose thinking about reparation within the realm of the ordinary, and consider what this might entail.
ISSN:1048-1885
1940-9222
DOI:10.1080/10481885.2020.1797402