Battered Women Who Kill: Impact of Expert Testimony Type and Timing

This study investigated the impact of expert testimony in a case involving a battered woman who killed her abusive husband. Mock jurors (N = 330) viewed a videotaped simulated trial involving a woman who had entered a self-defence plea in the shooting death of her abusive husband. Participants were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychiatry, psychology, and law psychology, and law, 2014-01, Vol.21 (1), p.1-15
Main Authors: Terrance, Cheryl A., Plumm, Karyn M., Kehn, Andre
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Battered woman syndrome
battered women
expert testimony
Husbands
juror decision making
Jurors
Pleas
Selfdefence
Timing
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study investigated the impact of expert testimony in a case involving a battered woman who killed her abusive husband. Mock jurors (N = 330) viewed a videotaped simulated trial involving a woman who had entered a self-defence plea in the shooting death of her abusive husband. Participants were presented with either expert testimony regarding the battered woman syndrome (BWS), social/agency (SA) testimony, or a no expert control. Because the timing of expert testimony may impact its application to the defendant's circumstances, expert testimony was presented either prior to or following the testimony of the defendant. Although jury verdicts failed to differ across expert testimony and timing conditions, individual mock juror opinions, and perceptions of her situation and mental stability did. Men in particular appeared to be differentially influenced by the alternative forms of expert testimony. Implications are discussed.
ISSN:1321-8719
1934-1687
DOI:10.1080/13218719.2013.773846