We are not the president's 'yes' men and women: how legislative budget scrutiny improved in Uganda

This paper seeks to identify the factors that explain how members of parliament improved budget scrutiny using unique empirical data collected in Uganda. Two instances are studied that mark the improvements. First, the 2001 Budget Act that established the Parliamentary Budget Committee with large co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of legislative studies 2021-04, Vol.27 (2), p.246-265
Main Author: Loozekoot, André
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Africa
Amendments
budgeting
Budgets
Change agents
Civil society
development
Entrepreneurs
gender
Legislators
Legislatures
Members of Parliament
parliament
Patronage
Presidents
Scrutiny
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper seeks to identify the factors that explain how members of parliament improved budget scrutiny using unique empirical data collected in Uganda. Two instances are studied that mark the improvements. First, the 2001 Budget Act that established the Parliamentary Budget Committee with large competencies for African standards. Second, the change in the 2012 Health Budget, a rare instance when parliament made significant budget amendments. The analysis reveals that political entrepreneurs used a window of opportunity to build a coalition for change. The window of opportunity opened at an event organised by civil society. The process that followed improved legislative budget scrutiny in a country with strong executive systems and strong patronage. Two factors have proven influential that are understudied in the current literature, civil society and female members of parliament.
ISSN:1357-2334
1743-9337
DOI:10.1080/13572334.2021.1909955