Is Social Justice and the City still relevant? Some thoughts

This year (2023) marks the 50th anniversary of David Harvey's Social Justice and the City. At the time of its publication, it was viewed by many as a text that revolutionized thinking in urban geography. Since then, it has been subjected to numerous reviews and critiques. Each time, its intelle...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scottish geographical journal 2023-10, Vol.139 (3-4), p.379-383
Main Author: Sanders, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
African Americans
black geography
Capitalism
Cities
critique
Ethnicity
feminist geography
Geography
Graduate students
Intersectionality
Marxism today
Race
Social justice
Social Justice and the City
Sociology
Urban geography
urbanism
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This year (2023) marks the 50th anniversary of David Harvey's Social Justice and the City. At the time of its publication, it was viewed by many as a text that revolutionized thinking in urban geography. Since then, it has been subjected to numerous reviews and critiques. Each time, its intellectual strength allowed it to maintain its place in the geography canon. This paper describes my encounters with Social Justice; how I read it in 1978 as an African American woman graduate student in geography; and how I read it now almost 50 years on. I argue that, while Social Justice of the City demonstrates Harvey's command of an extensive body of literature, it falls short in several ways. First, in its relative silence on the role of capitalism and the capitalist agenda, it lacks the political assertiveness (aggression) that the times required. Second, it fails to acknowledge a socio spatial dialectic or the importance of sociological variables (race/ethnicity, gender, and intersectionality) in planning. Finally, as a theory, it fails to anticipate the intellectual advances in the US and geography. This paper offers a brief synthesis of the ideas in existing reviews but is primarily a personal reflection.
ISSN:1470-2541
1751-665X
DOI:10.1080/14702541.2023.2238685