Determinants of Whistleblowing Intention: Evidence from the South Korean Government

In 2001, the South Korean government passed the Anti-Corruption Act, which provides whistleblower protection in the public sector. The system of protections and rewards was strengthened in 2011 by the Act on the Protection of Public Interest Whistleblowers. Although these laws ensure immunity-and ev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public performance & management review 2017-01, Vol.40 (4), p.676-700
Main Authors: Chang, Yongjin, Wilding, Mark, Shin, Min Chul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Central government
Corruption
Incentives
Marital status
ordered probit regression
Privileges & immunities
Public finance
Public interest
Public officials
Public sector
Regression analysis
Rewards
South Korean government
Tenure
Variables
Whistleblowing
whistleblowing determinants
whistleblowing intention
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In 2001, the South Korean government passed the Anti-Corruption Act, which provides whistleblower protection in the public sector. The system of protections and rewards was strengthened in 2011 by the Act on the Protection of Public Interest Whistleblowers. Although these laws ensure immunity-and even financial incentives-for whistleblowers, whistleblowing is still not a straightforward task. Based on a survey of 5,706 public officials in central government, this article examines how a range of factors influence whistleblowing intention: attitude, knowledge, colleague support, organizational support, and protection against retaliation. A number of demographic variables relating to gender expression, marital status, length of tenure, duty, and position type are used as controls. The results of the ordered probit regression analysis show that all of the independent variables have a significant positive effect on whistleblowing intention. However, colleague support and organizational support have the biggest effects, while perceived protection against retaliation has the smallest. This suggests that there is a need for future government efforts to build upon the available legal protections by focusing on creating a supportive culture among colleagues and in the organization more generally.
ISSN:1530-9576
1557-9271
DOI:10.1080/15309576.2017.1318761