Loading…

From Persuasion to Learning: An Intervention to Improve Leaders' Response to Disagreement

In this study we bring together Argyris and Schön's theories of interpersonal effectiveness and research on negotiation to develop a model of effective leadership behavior in conversations involving actual or anticipated disagreement. A concurrent mixed-methods design was used to assess shifts...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Leadership and policy in schools 2014-01, Vol.13 (3), p.260-296
Main Authors: Robinson, Viviane M. J., Sinnema, Claire E. L., Le Fevre, Deidre
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this study we bring together Argyris and Schön's theories of interpersonal effectiveness and research on negotiation to develop a model of effective leadership behavior in conversations involving actual or anticipated disagreement. A concurrent mixed-methods design was used to assess shifts in how 18 Australian superintendents responded to disagreement that arose in conversations about performance problems. The intervention included discussion of the model and its application to participants' own practice through analysis of transcripts, modeling, coaching, and feedback. Assessments of conversation skills and outcomes showed moderate to large intervention effects. The implications for leadership development and double-loop learning are discussed.
ISSN:1570-0763
1744-5043
DOI:10.1080/15700763.2014.922997