Loading…

A continuous performance task in preschool children: Relations between attention and performance

The continuous performance task is currently used to detect attention disorders in school-age children. However, its use with younger children is problematical, because indices measuring attention indirectly (omissions, commissions, reaction time) may be distorted by difficulties in following instru...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of developmental psychology 2008-07, Vol.5 (4), p.401-418
Main Authors: Danis, Agnès, Pêcheux, Marie-Germaine, Lefèvre, Carole, Bourdais, Cécile, Serres-Ruel, Josette
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The continuous performance task is currently used to detect attention disorders in school-age children. However, its use with younger children is problematical, because indices measuring attention indirectly (omissions, commissions, reaction time) may be distorted by difficulties in following instructions: the ability to maintain and manipulate instructions in working memory, and to inhibit inappropriate actions increases with age. In the present research, we adapted such a task for children between 2 years 6months and 5 years 6 months, and recorded visual activity in order to measure directly visual attention and to relate it to performance. Even very young children spend most of the time looking at the screen, but they display poor performances and are unable to re-engage in the task after a gap (2 consecutive omissions). At a medium level (age 3 years 6 months to 4 years) endogenous control of attention increases, children come back to the task, off-task looks shorten and reach the short values observed in older children. After 4 years 6 months no more gaps are observed, the consistency of reaction times shows that a controlled strategy, including shifts from and to the screen, is now adopted. The discussion suggests that only at this upper level do indirect performance indices evaluate attention.
ISSN:1740-5629
1740-5610
DOI:10.1080/17405620600866800