The usefulness of quality assurance for university management and academic staff: A case study of Finland and Iceland

With quality assurance related to the Bologna goals, universities are required to fulfil internationally accepted standardized criteria of quality. This tends to reinforce control in assessment. However, control-oriented evaluations seem to lack meaning for academic staff. The article explored the p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of higher education 2013-06, Vol.3 (2), p.206-219
Main Authors: Haapakorpi, Arja, Geirsdottir, Gudrun, Johannsdottir, Hyda
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accreditation (Institutions)
Audits (Verification)
Ausland
College Administration
Content Analysis
Credibility
Decision Making
Documentation
Educational Assessment
Educational Improvement
Evaluation
Evaluation Criteria
Evaluation Methods
Expertise
Finland
Finnland
Foreign Countries
Hochschule
Hochschulsystem
Iceland
Island
Outcomes of Education
Program Implementation
Quality Assurance
Qualitätssicherung
Semi Structured Interviews
Universities
university management
Verwaltung
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:With quality assurance related to the Bologna goals, universities are required to fulfil internationally accepted standardized criteria of quality. This tends to reinforce control in assessment. However, control-oriented evaluations seem to lack meaning for academic staff. The article explored the possibilities and space for improvement-oriented evaluation within quality assurance processes. The implementation, outcomes and utilization of audits/accreditation processes in three universities in Finland and Iceland are explored. The data consists of documents and interviews. The findings indicate that despite increasing control of universities there is still an opportunity for improvement within the quality assurance processes. Improvement is related to the preparatory phase of the evaluation process, where staff is actively engaged in the process, leading to utilization of outcomes. The external phase with control dominance lacks meaning for staff and has limited utilization. A shortage of credibility regarding assessment is a threat to quality assurance legitimation and utilization. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).
ISSN:2156-8243
2156-8235
2156-8243
DOI:10.1080/21568235.2013.772353