Loading…
Note on the coupled oscillator model solutions in crystalline optical activity
Many methods have been used in the crystalline optical activity solution, among them the traditional method of coupled oscillators. The two coupled oscillator model was first solved by Chandrasekhar, and the most general dispersion relations for the crystalline optical activity can be obtained from...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of optics. A, Pure and applied optics Pure and applied optics, 2006-06, Vol.8 (6), p.584-593 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Many methods have been used in the crystalline optical activity solution, among them the traditional method of coupled oscillators. The two coupled oscillator model was first solved by Chandrasekhar, and the most general dispersion relations for the crystalline optical activity can be obtained from its next extensions. However, the Chandrasekhar solution method seems to be based on a mistake in the computations. For this reason, the solution of a more complicated model of coupled oscillators which better corresponds to the structure of real crystals using the Condon relations is presented. This solution leads to the conclusion that, although it is possible to object to the Chandrasekhar solution method, the form of his final dispersion relations is correct. On the other hand, the dispersion relations following from the solution of more complicated coupled oscillator models are more convenient for the interpretation of the crystalline optical activity experimental data, which is demonstrated in examples of crystals of tellurium and benzil. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1464-4258 1741-3567 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1464-4258/8/6/014 |