Cross-language Babel structs-making scientific interfaces more efficient

Babel is an open-source language interoperability framework tailored to the needs of high-performance scientific computing. As an integral element of the Common Component Architecture, it is employed in a wide range of scientific applications where it is used to connect components written in differe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computational science & discovery 2013, Vol.6 (1), p.14004-1-18
Main Authors: Prantl, Adrian, Ebner, Dietmar, Epperly, Thomas G W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Computation
FORTRAN
Interoperability
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Programming languages
Reproduction
Source code
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Babel is an open-source language interoperability framework tailored to the needs of high-performance scientific computing. As an integral element of the Common Component Architecture, it is employed in a wide range of scientific applications where it is used to connect components written in different programming languages. In this paper we describe how we extended Babel to support interoperable tuple data types (structs). Structs are a common idiom in (mono-lingual) scientific application programming interfaces (APIs); they are an efficient way to pass tuples of nonuniform data between functions, and are supported natively by most programming languages. Using our extended version of Babel, developers of scientific codes can now pass structs as arguments between functions implemented in any of the supported languages. In C, C++, Fortran 2003 2008 and Chapel, structs can be passed without the overhead of data marshaling or copying, providing language interoperability at minimal cost. Other supported languages are Fortran 77, Fortran 90 95, Java and Python. We will show how we designed a struct implementation that is interoperable with all of the supported languages and present benchmark data to compare the performance of all language bindings, highlighting the differences between languages that offer native struct support and an object-oriented interface with getter setter methods. A case study shows how structs can help simplify the interfaces of scientific codes significantly.
ISSN:1749-4680
1749-4699
1749-4699
DOI:10.1088/1749-4699/6/1/014004