Geological, isothermal, and isobaric 3-D model construction in early stage of geothermal exploration

• Published in: IOP conference series. Earth and environmental science 2016-09, Vol.42 (1), p.12009
• Main Authors: Saputra, M P, Suryantini, Catigtig, D, Regandara, R, Asnin, S N, Pratama, A B
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acceleration; Constraint modelling; Construction; Cross-sections; Density; Exploration; Geologic mapping; Geological mapping; Geological surveys; Geology; Geomagnetism; Geophysics; Geothermal resources; High temperature; Hydrostatic pressure; Lithology; Pressure; Pressure distribution; Reservoirs; Stress concentration; Three dimensional models; Topographic mapping; Topographic maps
• ISSN: 1755-1307; 1755-1315
• DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/42/1/012009

Construction of geology, thermal anomaly and pressure distribution of a geothermal system in the early stage of exploration where data is limited is described using a 3-D software, Leapfrog Geothermal. The geological 3-D model was developed from a topographic map (derived from DEM data), geological map and literature studies reported in an early geological survey. The isothermal 3-D model was constructed using reservoir temperature estimation from geothermometry calculated from chemical analyses on surface manifestations, available shallow gradient temperature hole data and the normal gradient temperature (3°C 100m) for a nonthermal area. The isobaric 3-D model was built using hydrostatic pressure where the hydrostatic pressure is determined by the product of the fluid density, acceleration due to gravity, and depth. Fluid density is given by saturated liquid density as a function of temperature. There are some constraints on the modelling result such as (1) within the predicted reservoir, the geothermal gradient is not constant but continues to increase, thus, creating an anomalously high temperature at depth, and (2) the lithology model is made by interpolating and extrapolating cross-sections whereas usually only two to three geology sections were available for this study. Hence, the modeller must understand the geology. An additional cross section was developed by the modeller which may not be as suitable as the geologist constructed sections. The results of this study can be combined with geophysical data such as gravity, geomagnetic, micro-tremor and resistivity data. The combination of geological, geochemical, isothermal, isobaric and geophysical data could be used in (1) estimating the geometry and size of the geothermal reservoir, (2) predicting the depth of top reservoir, and (3) creating well prognosis for exploration and production wells.