Loading…

DP09 The lupus band test: a review of the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus

The lupus band test (LBT) is a direct immunofluorescence (DIF) technique which shows a band of localized immunoglobulins at the dermoepidermal junction in lesional, non-sun-exposed skin of patients with both systemic (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus and in the perilesional skin of patients wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of dermatology (1951) 2023-06, Vol.188 (Supplement_4)
Main Authors: Maolcatha, Sarah Ní, Dhonncha, Eilis Nic, O’Connor, Cathal, Dinneen, Sinead, Heffron, Cynthia
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The lupus band test (LBT) is a direct immunofluorescence (DIF) technique which shows a band of localized immunoglobulins at the dermoepidermal junction in lesional, non-sun-exposed skin of patients with both systemic (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus and in the perilesional skin of patients with SLE. However, low sensitivity and poor concordance between histological and clinical diagnoses warrant a review of the application of the LBT in the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus (LE). The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the LBT in diagnosing LE following clinicopathological correlation (CPC). All cases sent to our pathology department between 2011 and 2018 for DIF with a clinical query of LE were reviewed. Data collection included demographic details, pathology requests, histology and DIF reports, clinical reports and diagnoses and serology. Of 256 histology requests, 9.0% (n = 23) had a positive LBT. This was discordant with the prevalence of LE diagnosis, as 46.3% were diagnosed with LE following CPC. The sensitivity and specificity of the LBT for LE were 17.6% and 98.8%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 92.9% and negative predictive value of 58.2%. The LBT is not a sensitive diagnostic test for LE, but is highly specific and should be considered as a supportive diagnostic tool for LE. This is the largest reported case series to evaluate the efficacy of the LBT in the diagnosis of LE.
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
DOI:10.1093/bjd/ljad113.222