Immunometric Assay Interference

Background: The primary aim of the study was to reduce interference in an in-house two-site, two-step immunometric assay. Methods: In the running laboratory routine, 11 261 samples were tested with a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay with bovine immunoglobulin but no murine immunoglobulins in the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2002-04, Vol.48 (4), p.613-621
Main Authors: Bjerner, Johan, Nustad, Kjell, Norum, Lars F, Olsen, Kari Hauge, Børmer, Ole P
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: The primary aim of the study was to reduce interference in an in-house two-site, two-step immunometric assay. Methods: In the running laboratory routine, 11 261 samples were tested with a carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay with bovine immunoglobulin but no murine immunoglobulins in the buffer, in parallel to our routine CEA assay, using 15 mg/L heat-treated nonspecific murine immunoglobulin (MAK33) in the buffer and with the Fc fragments removed from the capture antibody. Results: The frequency of interference was estimated to be 4.0% (95% confidence interval, 3.3–4.7%). The addition of 15 mg/L native MAK33 had little effect (frequency, 3.9%; 95% confidence interval, 3.2–4.6%), whereas adding 15 mg/L heat-treated MAK33 reduced interference to 0.86% (0.61–1.12%), and adding 50 mg/L reduced it further to 0.06% (0–0.13%). Removing the Fc fragments by itself reduced interference to 0.10% (0.02–0.19%). There were no statistically significant differences for age (P
ISSN:0009-9147
1530-8561
DOI:10.1093/clinchem/48.4.613