Loading…
P573 Frequency and effectiveness of empirical anti-TNF dose intensification in inflammatory bowel disease: an on-going systematic review with meta-analysis
Abstract Background Loss of response to anti-TNF therapies in inflammatory bowel disease occurs in a high proportion of patients. However, the precise incidence of dose intensification (DI) and its effectiveness remain unclear. Our aims were: (1) To evaluate the need of DI of anti-TNF therapy either...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Crohn's and colitis 2020-01, Vol.14 (Supplement_1), p.S482-S483 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract
Background
Loss of response to anti-TNF therapies in inflammatory bowel disease occurs in a high proportion of patients. However, the precise incidence of dose intensification (DI) and its effectiveness remain unclear. Our aims were: (1) To evaluate the need of DI of anti-TNF therapy either by increasing the dose or decreasing doses’ interval; (2) To evaluate possible variables influencing its requirement; (3) To assess the effectiveness of empirical DI.
Methods
Bibliographical searches were performed until January 2019. Selection: prospective and retrospective studies assessing the loss of response to anti-TNF therapy, considered as the need of DI, in Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients treated for at least 12 weeks with an anti-TNF drug. Exclusion criteria: Studies using anti-TNF as prophylaxis for postoperative recurrence in CD or those where DI was based on therapeutic drug monitoring. Data were analyzed by means of the inverse variance method using a random effect model and stratifying by medical baseline condition (UC vs. CD), anti-TNF drug and follow-up. Effectiveness was assessed by intention-to-treat analysis.
Results
Up to now, 107 studies (11,377 patients) were included. The overall rate of DI requirement for naïve patients after 12 and 36 months of follow-up was 35% (95% CI=26–45%, I2=95%, 15 studies) and 48% (41–55%, I2= 77%, 9 studies); respectively. Frequencies of DI requirement stratified by subgroup analysis are presented in the table (all patients being naïve except CD patients treated with adalimumab (ADA), including naïve and no naïve).
Anti-TNF
UC/CD
Follow-up time (months)
DI requirement (%, 95% CI)
I
2
(%)
Number of studies included
Infliximab (IFX)
UC+CD
12
37 (26–48)
95
13
IFX
UC+CD
36
48 (41–55)
79
8
IFX
UC
12
57 (48–65)
73
5
IFX
UC
36
52 (33–71)
87
3
IFX
CD
12
25 (16–44)
89
8
IFX
CD
36
46 (38–55)
78
5
ADA
UC+CD
12
31 (24–38)
91
11
ADA
UC+CD
36
43 (36–49)
44
4
ADA
UC
12
25 (18–33)
69
2
ADA
UC
36
50 (34–66)
Not applicable
1
ADA
CD
12
33 (24–42)
93
9
ADA
CD
36
41 (35–48)
46
3
The overall short-term response and remission rates to empirical DI were 67% (95% CI: 63–72%; I2=73%; 31 studies) and 45% (95% CI: 35–55%; I2=9%; 23 studies), respectively; subgroup analyses are summarised in the table.
Anti-TNF
UC/CD
Remission rate (%, 95% CI)
I
2
(%)
Number of studies included
IFX
UC+CD
44 (29–59)
89
10
IFX
UC
51 (27–75)
93
5
IFX
CD
36 (27–44)
82
5
ADA
UC+CD
38 (22–54)
89
8
ADA
UC
14 (3–24)
57
3
ADA
CD
55(33–77) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-9946 1876-4479 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz203.701 |