Loading…

P597 Pooled safety analyses from Phase 3 studies of filgotinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract Background Filgotinib (FIL) is an oral, selective Janus Kinase 1 inhibitor under development for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory diseases. Safety and efficacy of FIL was investigated in the FINCH clinical program, which includes three Phase 3, randomised, m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Crohn's and colitis 2020-01, Vol.14 (Supplement_1), p.S497-S498
Main Authors: Besuyen, R, Walker, D, Winthrop, K, Genovese, M, Combe, B, Tanaka, Y, Kivitz, A, Matzkies, F, Bartok, B, Ye, L, Guo, Y, Tasset, C, Sundy, J, Keystone, E, Westhovens, R, Rigby, W, Burmester, G
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Filgotinib (FIL) is an oral, selective Janus Kinase 1 inhibitor under development for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory diseases. Safety and efficacy of FIL was investigated in the FINCH clinical program, which includes three Phase 3, randomised, multicentre studies in patients with moderate to severely active RA. FINCH1: patients with inadequate response to MTX (NCT02889796); FINCH2: patients receiving conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) with inadequate response to biological DMARDs (NCT02873936); FINCH3: MTX-naïve patients initiating MTX ± FIL, or receiving FIL monotherapy (NCT02886728). We present pooled safety data up to 24 weeks (W24). Methods The FINCH studies enrolled patients with RA (2010 ACR/EULAR criteria), ≥6 swollen joints and ≥6 tender joints at screening and Day 1. Safety analyses included patients receiving ≥1 dose of study drug. Patients in FINCH 1 and 2 who did not experience at least a 20% improvement in both swollen joint count and tender joint count by W14 discontinued study drug and switched to a standard of care. W24 safety data from all studies were aggregated and summarised. Key safety endpoints were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, TEAEs of interest, deaths and treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities. Results 3452 patients were evaluated; 2088 received FIL. At W24, the frequency of TEAEs and TEAEs of interest were similar for those who received FIL and those in the control groups (Table 1). Most TEAEs were infections. Laboratory abnormality rates were similar between FIL and control groups, and were mild to moderate (grades 1 and 2). Overall, the frequency of major adverse cardiac events, herpes zoster virus, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism was low, and similar across groups. Conclusion Pooled data from this large database highlights the favourable safety and tolerability profile of FIL in patients with RA both as monotherapy and in combination with MTX/csDMARD.
ISSN:1873-9946
1876-4479
DOI:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz203.725