P918Tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

• Published in: European heart journal 2019-10, Vol.40 (Supplement_1)
• Main Authors: Shamekhi, J, Stundl, A, Al-Kassou, B, Weber, M, Sedaghat, A, Grube, E, Nickenig, G, Werner, N, Sinning, J M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0195-668X; 1522-9645
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0514

Abstract Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the treatment of choice in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis and increased surgical risk. A significant number of these elderly patients have concomitant tricuspid valve regurgitation. The impact on outcome, however, is still matter of debate. Objectives In this prospective observational study, we investigated the impact of concomitant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) on outcome in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods Between February 2008 and May 2018, 1411 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and increased operative risk underwent TAVI at the Heart Center Bonn and participated in this study, after written informed consent was obtained. Before TAVI procedure, all patients underwent a careful cardiac evaluation and interdisciplinary discussion within the local, institutional Heart Team. The pre-interventional 3D echocardiography was used to determine the degree of tricuspid valve regurgitation. According to the severity of TR, patients were divided into two groups; patients with TR < II and patients with moderate to severe TR ≥ II andcompared regarding rates of mortality after 1 year of follow-up between the two groups. Results Out of 1411 TAVI patients, 802 (56.8%) had tricuspid regurgitation < II, 610 (43.2%) patients suffered from tricuspid regurgitation ≥ II. The mean age of our study population was 81.1 (±6.5). The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups, such as extracardiac arteriopathy (TR < II: 44% vs TR ≥ II: 41.6%; p=0.37), diabetes (TR < II: 27.5% vs TR ≥ II: 27.7%; p=0.92) or arterial hypertension (TR < II: 91% vs TR ≥ II: 93.2%; p=0.64). However, patients with concomitant TR ≥ II had significantly more often NYHA class IV (TR < II: 5.0% vs TR ≥ II: 15.4%; p