Loading…
P2481The effect of DPP-4i, GLP-1RA, SGLT-2i and long-acting insulin on platelet function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Abstract Background Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at higher risk for thrombotic events. Platelet function may be used to assess prothrombotic state in patients with cardiovascular disease. Purpose We aimed to investigate whether the administration of novel antidiabetic agents inf...
Saved in:
Published in: | European heart journal 2019-10, Vol.40 (Supplement_1) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract
Background
Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at higher risk for thrombotic events. Platelet function may be used to assess prothrombotic state in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Purpose
We aimed to investigate whether the administration of novel antidiabetic agents influence platelet function in TDM2 patients.
Patients and methods
We 60 enrolled consecutive patients with T2DM, on stable antidiabetic therapy, who did not achieve therapeutic targets. Subjects were assessed to receive an additional anti-diabetic agent; dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i, n=14), glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1RA, n=24), sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i, n=22). Platelet reactivity was measured with PFA-200 collagen/epinephrine (c-EPI) and PFA-200 collagen/ADP (c-ADP) closure time. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), c-EPI and c-ADP were assessed at baseline and 3 months after treatment intensification.
Results
There was no difference between the study groups regarding gender, age, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, Hba1c and CADP or CEPI (p=NS for all) at baseline. All groups achieved better glycemic control in terms of HbA1c values between baseline and follow-up (for DPP4i: 7.4±0.2% vs 6.7±0.2%, for GLP1RA: 8.3±0.2% vs 6.9±0.1%, for SGLT2i: 7.5±0.1% vs 6.7±0.1% and for insulin 9.8±0.5% vs 7.7±0.4%, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
DOI: | 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.0811 |