Loading…
Non-asymptotic estimates for TUSLA algorithm for non-convex learning with applications to neural networks with ReLU activation function
We consider nonconvex stochastic optimization problems where the objective functions have super-linearly growing and discontinuous stochastic gradients. In such a setting, we provide a nonasymptotic analysis for the tamed unadjusted stochastic Langevin algorithm (TUSLA) introduced in Lovas et al. (2...
Saved in:
Published in: | IMA journal of numerical analysis 2024-06, Vol.44 (3), p.1464-1559 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We consider nonconvex stochastic optimization problems where the objective functions have super-linearly growing and discontinuous stochastic gradients. In such a setting, we provide a nonasymptotic analysis for the tamed unadjusted stochastic Langevin algorithm (TUSLA) introduced in Lovas et al. (2020). In particular, we establish nonasymptotic error bounds for the TUSLA algorithm in Wasserstein-1 and Wasserstein-2 distances. The latter result enables us to further derive nonasymptotic estimates for the expected excess risk. To illustrate the applicability of the main results, we consider an example from transfer learning with ReLU neural networks, which represents a key paradigm in machine learning. Numerical experiments are presented for the aforementioned example, which support our theoretical findings. Hence, in this setting, we demonstrate both theoretically and numerically that the TUSLA algorithm can solve the optimization problem involving neural networks with ReLU activation function. Besides, we provide simulation results for synthetic examples where popular algorithms, e.g., ADAM, AMSGrad, RMSProp and (vanilla) stochastic gradient descent algorithm, may fail to find the minimizer of the objective functions due to the super-linear growth and the discontinuity of the corresponding stochastic gradient, while the TUSLA algorithm converges rapidly to the optimal solution. Moreover, we provide an empirical comparison of the performance of TUSLA with popular stochastic optimizers on real-world datasets, as well as investigate the effect of the key hyperparameters of TUSLA on its performance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0272-4979 1464-3642 |
DOI: | 10.1093/imanum/drad038 |