Loading…

Executive Control of Agency Adjudication: Capacity, Selection, and Precedential Rulemaking

Abstract While the volume of adjudication by federal agencies far outstrips the volume of cases decided by the federal judiciary, researchers have devoted relatively little attention to agency adjudication and political control thereof. We study three mechanisms of presidential control of immigratio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of law, economics, & organization economics, & organization, 2023-11, Vol.39 (3), p.682-721
Main Authors: Hausman, David K, Ho, Daniel E, Krass, Mark S, McDonough, Anne
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract While the volume of adjudication by federal agencies far outstrips the volume of cases decided by the federal judiciary, researchers have devoted relatively little attention to agency adjudication and political control thereof. We study three mechanisms of presidential control of immigration adjudication: capacity-building, selection, and precedential rulemaking. First, consistent with work on bureaucratic capacity, the Trump administration achieved its goal of increasing removals of noncitizens through an unprecedented increase in total hiring of immigration judges (IJs). Second, contrary to expectations from the literatures on judicial behavior and bureaucratic politics, we find little evidence of partisan effects in IJ selection. Third, we demonstrate the substantial power of what we call “precedential rulemaking”—the power by the Attorney General to select cases in which to issue binding precedent. These results illustrate the importance of incorporating mechanisms of supervisory and legal control into the study of administrative courts.
ISSN:8756-6222
1465-7341
DOI:10.1093/jleo/ewac012