Loading…

P1160INCREASED REMOVAL RATES OF FLUID AND SODIUM DURING STEADY CONCENTRATION PERITONEAL DIALYSIS COMPARED TO ICODEXTRIN AND PERITONEAL EQUILIBRATION TEST

Abstract Background and Aims Removal of fluid and sodium may be a major challenge in PD, which can be addressed using icodextrin for the long dwells. Steady concentration PD (SCPD) with Carry Life® UF is a novel treatment modality where the intraperitoneal glucose concentration can be kept stable th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2020-06, Vol.35 (Supplement_3)
Main Authors: Carlsson, Ola, Heimbürger, Olof, Johansson, Ann-Cathrine, Martus, Giedre, Wilkie, Martin, Hegbrant, Jörgen, Johansson, Ann, De Leon, Charlotte
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background and Aims Removal of fluid and sodium may be a major challenge in PD, which can be addressed using icodextrin for the long dwells. Steady concentration PD (SCPD) with Carry Life® UF is a novel treatment modality where the intraperitoneal glucose concentration can be kept stable throughout the treatment maintaining ultrafiltration and sodium removal. This is performed by transferring a small volume of the dialysate into the device, where glucose is added and the dialysate returned to the patient. The present study was performed to compare the effect of SCPD with icodextrin and peritoneal equilibration test (PET) on ultrafiltration and sodium removal. Method Eight stable PD patients (high or high average transporters) were included in the study. Subjects were treated with three 5-hour Carry Life UF treatments using three different glucose doses (11, 14, 20 g/h). An initial fill with 1500 ml, 1.36% glucose PD solution was used. A small volume of dialysate was drained hourly to avoid overfill. An icodextrin 11-hour dwell (2000 ml, 7.5% Extraneal®), and a 4-hour PET (2000 ml, 2.27% glucose PD solution), were used as controls. Data expressed as mean ± SD, statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA, **p
ISSN:0931-0509
1460-2385
DOI:10.1093/ndt/gfaa142.P1160