Loading…

OS12.6.A MOLECULAR GLIOBLASTOMAS - BETTER PROGNOSIS AFTER CORRECTING FOR TREATMENT DIFFERENCES

Abstract BACKGROUND Molecular glioblastoma (mGBM), without classical histological features, was defined in the 2021 WHO classification based on select criteria (EGFR amplification, TERT promoter mutation (pTERT), chromosome 7+/10-). Subsequent validation relied on retrospective patient re-diagnosis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2024-10, Vol.26 (Supplement_5), p.v29-v30
Main Authors: Robinson, S D, Clark, M, MacColl, J, Forner, S, Wong, A, Srimat Tirumala, L N K, Hatton, N L, Lathangue, H, Wontumi, S, Conkey, D, Rayner, L, Patel, K, de Boisanger, J, Fullagar, A, Lachmann, E, Durage, P T T, Edlmann, E, Pillai, V, de Luna, P J, Teoh, M, Choudhury, M, Williams, A, Norris, T, Golten, J, Murphy, S, Kingdon, S, Yogalingham, K, Stewart, G, Lau, S E, Kahan, J, Olukiran, G, Heckelmann, M, Giamas, G, Critchley, G, Chandy, E
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract BACKGROUND Molecular glioblastoma (mGBM), without classical histological features, was defined in the 2021 WHO classification based on select criteria (EGFR amplification, TERT promoter mutation (pTERT), chromosome 7+/10-). Subsequent validation relied on retrospective patient re-diagnosis and/or historical histological GBMs (hGBMs) controls. Whether pTERT only mGBMs also have a poor prognosis remains uncertain. We comprehensively characterised mGBMs compared to concurrently diagnosed hGBMs. MATERIAL AND METHODS We identified pathologically confirmed GBMs diagnosed in 2021 in a multicentre retrospective study. Patients were diagnosed and treated as per their centre’s standard practice. Most centres offered routine molecular testing. Demographic, tumour and treatment characteristic differences were assessed by unpaired t-test. Kaplan-Meier analysis was from surgery date and survival differences compared by log rank. RESULTS We identified 944 pathologically confirmed GBMs from 31 centres, and 61 were mGBM (9.3% of tested cases). For mGBM patients, median age was 62 (vs 63), 66% were male (vs 64%) and 84% were WHO performance status 0-1 (vs 76%). Seizures were the most common presentation (33 vs 26%, p=0.300), plus significantly more sensory deficits (21 vs 10%, p=0.043) but significantly less speech (13 vs 28%, p=0.002) and cognitive deficits (15 vs 26%, p=0.027). mGBM patients were more likely to have multifocal disease (36% vs 23%, p=0.011) and less likely to have contrast enhancement (69% vs 96%, p10%) methylated (p=0.840). There was a trend for delay from initial imaging to surgery (median 19 vs 15 days) and surgery to radiotherapy (RT) (median 46 vs 40 days), resulting in a significant delay from initial imaging to RT (median 77 vs 57 days, p95% resected 15 vs 35%, p
ISSN:1522-8517
1523-5866
DOI:10.1093/neuonc/noae144.087