Loading…

An EORTC pilot study of filgrastim (recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor) as support to a high dose-intensive epiadriamycin-cyclophosphamide regimen in chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

Background In an attempt to increase chemotherapy dose intensity by step-wise reduction of the time interval between treatment cycles, filgrastim was administered to breast cancer patients receiving a three-month combination chemotherapy with epirubicin (E) and cyclophosphamide (C). Patients and met...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of oncology 1995-09, Vol.6 (7), p.673-677
Main Authors: Piccart, M. J., Bruning, P., Wildiers, J., Awada, A., Schornagel, J. H., Thomas, J., Tomiak, E., Bartholomeus, S., Witteveen, P. O., Paridaens, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background In an attempt to increase chemotherapy dose intensity by step-wise reduction of the time interval between treatment cycles, filgrastim was administered to breast cancer patients receiving a three-month combination chemotherapy with epirubicin (E) and cyclophosphamide (C). Patients and methods Chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer received fixed doses of E (120 mg/m2) and C (830 mg/m2) by 15-min i.v. infusion on day 1 of each cycle and filgrastim at a dose of 4 μ/kg once daily by SC injection starting 24 hours after chemotherapy. Cohorts of patients were treated in successive schedules, each schedule corresponding to a specified time interval between chemotherapy cycles. The toxicity observed in each schedule was evaluated before patients were accrued to the next schedule, which corresponded to a shorter time interval between chemotherapy cycles. Results The maximum tolerated schedule was E (120 mg/m2) plus C (830 mg/m2) given every 14 days with filgrastim support from day 2 until day 13. On this schedule, 5 of 12 patients experienced dose-intensity-limiting toxicities (DLT) during the 3-month study period. Non-hematological DLT occurred in 2/12 patients (mucositis, skin toxicity) while 3/12 experienced febrile neutropenia requiring i.v. antibiotics. All patients achieved recovery of ANC to > 1.5 × 109/l by the time of scheduled retreatment. The combination of filgrastim with this regimen did not seem to add major toxicities. The efficacy was high, with 87% of patients achieving an objective response and a median response duration of 18 months (range: 4–;52 months). Conclusions Filgrastim permits at 33% increase in ‘EC’ dose intensification over that of the conventional every-3-week administration. Randomized studies should now be initiated to evaluate the merit, if any, of ‘accelerated’ chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059283