Rejecting and accepting international migrant patients into primary care practices: a mixed method study

• Published in: International journal of migration, health and social care health and social care, 2015-06, Vol.11 (2), p.108-129
• Main Authors: Mota, Lorena, Mayhew, Maureen, Grant, Karen J, Batista, Ricardo, Pottie, Kevin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Access; Alternative approaches; Bias; Canada Health Act; Community resources; Education; Experts; Family physicians; Fear & phobias; Financial loss; Foreign students; Health & social care; Health care access; Health care policy; Health education; Health information; Health insurance; Health planning; Immigration; Inequalities & diverse/minority groups; Insurance coverage; Interpreters; Interviews; Medical treatment; Migrant workers; Migrants; Mixed methods research; Noncitizens; Nurse practitioners; Patients; Population; Primary care; Refugees; Vulnerable groups
• ISSN: 1747-9894; 2042-8650
• DOI: 10.1108/IJMHSC-04-2014-0013

Purpose – International migrants frequently struggle to obtain access to local primary care practices. The purpose of this paper is to explore factors associated with rejecting and accepting migrant patients into Canadian primary care practices. Design/methodology/approach – Mixed methods study. Using a modified Delphi consensus approach among a network of experts on migrant health, the authors identified and prioritized factors related to rejecting and accepting migrants into primary care practices. From ten semi-structured interviews with the less-migrant-care experienced practitioners, the authors used qualitative description to further examine nuances of these factors. Findings – Consensus was reached on practitioner-level factors associated with a reluctance of practitioners to accept migrants − communication challenges, high-hassle factor, limited availability of clinicians, fear of financial loss, lack of awareness of migrant groups, and limited migrant health knowledge – and on factors associated with accepting migrants − feeling useful, migrant health education, third party support, learning about other cultures, experience working overseas, and enjoying the challenge of treating diseases from around the world. Interviews supported use of interpreters, community resources, alternative payment methods, and migrant health education as strategies to overcome the identified challenges. Research limitations/implications – This Delphi network represented the views of practitioners who had substantive experience in providing care for migrants. Interviews with less-experienced practitioners were used to mitigate this bias. Originality/value – This study identifies the facilitators and challenges of migrants’ access to primary care from the perspective of primary care practitioners, work that complements research from patients’ perspectives. Strategies to address these findings are discussed.