Loading…
The Location Problem for the Provisioning of Protected Slices in NFV-Based MEC Infrastructure
The support of stringent requirements such as ultra-low latency and ultra-reliability of the forthcoming 5G services poses several challenges to telecommunications infrastructure providers. Network Function Virtualization, multi-access edge computing (MEC), and network slicing capabilities can help...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE journal on selected areas in communications 2020-07, Vol.38 (7), p.1505-1514 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The support of stringent requirements such as ultra-low latency and ultra-reliability of the forthcoming 5G services poses several challenges to telecommunications infrastructure providers. Network Function Virtualization, multi-access edge computing (MEC), and network slicing capabilities can help the support of such requirements. However, a trade-off between the cost of resource deployment and the support of service requirements needs to be taken into account in the design of NFV-based 5G networks. In this paper, we investigate the MEC location problem, which aims at selecting locations to place MECs hosting protected slices. We propose a MEC location problem enhanced with 1: 1 and 1:N protection schemes for the provisioning of protected slices. In the 1: 1 scheme, protection is assured by reserving a backup slice for each tenant, whereas in the 1:N scheme, a backup slice is shared among N tenants. The problem is modeled as a multi-criteria optimization problem and solved by the employment of a multi-objective evolutionary non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. A comparison between the 1: 1 and 1:N protection schemes is carried out in the context of 5G network slicing. Results show that the protection scheme 1: 1 can reduce the response time, at a higher deployment cost when compared to the 1:N scheme. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0733-8716 1558-0008 |
DOI: | 10.1109/JSAC.2020.2986869 |