Loading…
Optimizing the Number of Hops and Retransmissions for Energy Efficient Multi-Hop Underwater Acoustic Communications
Energy efficient underwater communications systems design is a crucial task, once battery replacement may be barely feasible in this scenario. As acoustic underwater channels are usually harsher than terrestrial wireless channels, decreasing the transmission distance through a multi-hop approach is...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE sensors journal 2016-05, Vol.16 (10), p.3927-3938 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Energy efficient underwater communications systems design is a crucial task, once battery replacement may be barely feasible in this scenario. As acoustic underwater channels are usually harsher than terrestrial wireless channels, decreasing the transmission distance through a multi-hop approach is very appealing. In this sense, in this paper, we analyze how much energy is required to successfully transfer an information bit over a multi-hop underwater acoustic network while considering the optimum number of hops, retransmissions, code rate, and signal-to-noise ratio. We also investigate the impact of delay constraints in the total energy consumption, by allowing limited or unlimited retransmissions. Our results show that great energy savings can be obtained when the above-mentioned parameters are jointly optimized for a given link distance. Moreover, even though the impact of multiple hops is more beneficial, allowing for a small number of retransmissions lead to important energy savings. Finally, we compare the obtained results with a terrestrial wireless communications case, showing that an adequate modeling of the underwater scenario is imperative for an energy efficient design, once the optimal number of hops for terrestrial wireless may considerably differ from that for underwater communications. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1530-437X 1558-1748 |
DOI: | 10.1109/JSEN.2016.2532384 |