Loading…
Aquarius Scatterometer Calibration
In this paper, we discuss the Aquarius scatterometer calibration, starting with the instrument calibration. We examine the stability of Aquarius as quantified using the loop-back power and estimated receiver gain to shown Aquarius has been extremely stable to order 0.1 dB since mission start. We sho...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing 2015-12, Vol.8 (12), p.5424-5432 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this paper, we discuss the Aquarius scatterometer calibration, starting with the instrument calibration. We examine the stability of Aquarius as quantified using the loop-back power and estimated receiver gain to shown Aquarius has been extremely stable to order 0.1 dB since mission start. We show the temperatures of scatterometer components not contained in the loop-back path have been controlled precisely to 0.5°C to minimize any temperature-dependent losses. Combined, these results show Aquarius produces accurate sigma 0 over the mission lifetime. In the next section, we discuss the stability as quantified using external models and again show stability to order 0.1 dB in very good agreement with instrument-only methods. Then, we discuss the methods used to absolutely calibrate Aquarius sigma 0 with respect to previous L-band radar systems. We show that Aquarius is relatively calibrated to order 0.1 dB for copolarization channels and better than 0.2 dB for cross-polarization channels. Finally, we discuss the calibration of the Aquarius wind speed product. We compare the Aquarius wind speed with radiometer wind speed products, other radar scatterometers, and numerical weather products. We show that the Aquarius wind speed product is on par with previous scatterometers in data quality. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1939-1404 2151-1535 |
DOI: | 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2493449 |