Loading…

An Integrated Mutually Compensatory Dual Receiver for AGV Misalignment-Tolerant IPT Charging

The inevitable misalignment of magnetic couplers presents a substantial challenge to the power transmission and efficiency of inductive power transfer (IPT) systems. In this brief, an integrated mutually compensated dual receiver (IMCDR) IPT system for automated guided vehicles with high-efficiency...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on circuits and systems. II, Express briefs Express briefs, 2025-01, Vol.72 (1), p.313-317
Main Authors: Li, Guangyao, Zhang, Hailong, Chen, Yafei, Xie, Junchen, Jo, Cheol-Hee, Zhu, Chunbo, Cui, Shumei, Kim, Dong-Hee
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The inevitable misalignment of magnetic couplers presents a substantial challenge to the power transmission and efficiency of inductive power transfer (IPT) systems. In this brief, an integrated mutually compensated dual receiver (IMCDR) IPT system for automated guided vehicles with high-efficiency constant current (CC) charging over a large misalignment tolerance (MT) range is proposed. The dual-channel receiver comprises two solenoid coils perpendicularly wound to each other to capture the magnetic flux along the y- and z-axes generated by the transmitter. In this way, two mutual inductances with opposite changing trends are utilized to synthesize an equivalent mutual inductance (M_{\mathrm { eq}}) over an MT range. Further, the proposed IMCDR structure was optimized using the finite element method to obtain the optimal receiver length and M_{\mathrm { eq}} fluctuation rate. Finally, a 535-W/85-kHz experimental prototype was conducted. Experimental results showed that the proposed IPT system can maintain the output current fluctuation rate within 5.82% with fixed duty/frequency condition when operating over a 172% MT range, and the system efficiency ranges from 88.42% to 90.67%.
ISSN:1549-7747
1558-3791
DOI:10.1109/TCSII.2024.3474676