Counterfactual Explainable Conversational Recommendation

Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs) fundamentally differ from traditional recommender systems by interacting with users in a conversational session to accurately predict their current preferences and provide personalized recommendations. Although current CRSs have achieved favorable recommenda...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering 2024-06, Vol.36 (6), p.2388-2400
Main Authors: Yu, Dianer, Li, Qian, Wang, Xiangmeng, Li, Qing, Xu, Guandong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adaptation models
Cognition
conversational recommender system
counterfactual explainability
Datasets
Decision making
Interactive recommendations
Oral communication
Real time
Recommender systems
Semantics
Training
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Conversational Recommender Systems (CRSs) fundamentally differ from traditional recommender systems by interacting with users in a conversational session to accurately predict their current preferences and provide personalized recommendations. Although current CRSs have achieved favorable recommendation performance, the explainability is still in its infancy stage. Most of the CRSs tend to provide coarse explanations and fail to explore the impact of minimal alterations on the recommendation decisions on items. In this paper, we are the first to incorporate the counterfactual techniques into CRS and propose a C ounterfactual E xplainable C onversational R ecommender (CECR) to enhance the recommendation model from a counterfactual perspective. Counterfactual explanations can offer fine-grained reasons to explain users' real-time intentions, meanwhile generating counterfactual samples for augmenting the training dataset to enhance recommendation performance. Specifically, CECR adaptively learns users' preferences based on the conversation context and effectively responds to users' real-time feedback during multiple rounds of conversation. Furthermore, CECR actively generates counterfactual samples to augment the training set and thus leading to a constant improvement in recommendation performance. Empirical experiments carried out on three benchmark datasets show that our CECR outperforms state-of-the-art CRSs in terms of recommendation performance and explainability.
ISSN:1041-4347
1558-2191
DOI:10.1109/TKDE.2023.3322403