Theoretical and experimental comparison of indirect field-oriented controllers for induction motors

A theoretical and experimental comparison between standard and recently-developed improved indirect field-oriented controllers for induction motors is presented. It is shown that standard indirect field-oriented control algorithm provides asymptotic speed and flux regulation, while the improved one...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on power electronics 2003-01, Vol.18 (1), p.151-163
Main Authors: Peresada, S., Tilli, A., Tonielli, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Associate members
Asymptotic properties
Control
Control systems
Controllers
Dynamics
Experiments
Flux
Induction motors
Machine vector control
Motors
Open loop systems
Robust control
Robust stabilization
Robustness
Rotors
Stators
Theory
Torque control
Tracking
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A theoretical and experimental comparison between standard and recently-developed improved indirect field-oriented controllers for induction motors is presented. It is shown that standard indirect field-oriented control algorithm provides asymptotic speed and flux regulation, while the improved one guarantees global exponential speed-flux tracking under condition of constant load torque. The difference between the flux sub-system design for the two controllers is analyzed. It is shown that the improved controller provides closed loop properties for flux subsystem when motor is rotating, leading to robust stabilization of the rotor flux vector space position and robust tracking of its modulus. It is demonstrated that both controllers have similar complexity and can be tuned using standard procedure for cascaded systems. Intensive experimental study shows that improved controller provides about one order higher speed tracking performance as compared with standard solution. Moreover, improved robustness with respect to rotor parameters variation leads to improved energy efficiency and robust stabilization of dynamic performance.
ISSN:0885-8993
1941-0107
DOI:10.1109/TPEL.2002.807123