Runtime and Jitter on a Laser-Triggered Spark-Gap Switch

The University of Missouri has completed a new facility, named Tiger, for pulsed-power experimentation. Tiger consists of a 2.8-MV 450-kJ Marx bank that charges up to four 7-nF intermediate storage capacitors (I-stores) in parallel. When charged, the storage capacitors are switched into a resistive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on plasma science 2008-10, Vol.36 (5), p.2541-2545
Main Authors: Hutsel, B.T., Benwell, A., Kovaleski, S.D., Kemp, M.A., Sullivan, D.L., Gahl, J.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Breakdown
Capacitors
Charging
Electric breakdown
Electric power
Electricity
Electrodes
Experimentation
Experiments
Facilities
Gas lasers
Jitter
Lasers
light-triggered switches
Marx generators
Optical pulses
Runtime
Spark gaps
Switches
Testing
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The University of Missouri has completed a new facility, named Tiger, for pulsed-power experimentation. Tiger consists of a 2.8-MV 450-kJ Marx bank that charges up to four 7-nF intermediate storage capacitors (I-stores) in parallel. When charged, the storage capacitors are switched into a resistive load through an SF 6 -filled laser-triggered gas switch. This switch has been designed to study the factors affecting runtime and jitter of spark-gap switches. All experiments presented in this paper were performed with a single I-store. The test switch was operated from about 500 kV up to 1.25 MV, at switch pressures from 10 to 50 psig. A 30-mJ 266-nm Nd:YAG laser was focused between the switch electrodes to initiate breakdown in the switch. The University of Missouri has examined laser energy, percentage of self-break, and focal length to determine their relation to runtime and jitter. A short discussion of the Tiger facility is presented with experimental results of jitter and runtime tests. The end goal of this paper is to understand the factors contributing to increased jitter and runtime and, thereby, provide paths to improved switch performance.
ISSN:0093-3813
1939-9375
DOI:10.1109/TPS.2008.2004237