Loading…

CFAR Outlier Detection With Forward Methods

Separation or classification of signal-present samples from noise-only samples is studied. The false-alarm probability implies how many noise-only samples are wrongly classified as outliers, and typically it should be smaller than some upper limit. The noise distribution parameters are not known a p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on signal processing 2007-09, Vol.55 (9), p.4702-4706
Main Authors: Lehtomaki, J.J., Vartiainen, J., Juntti, M., Saarnisaari, H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Separation or classification of signal-present samples from noise-only samples is studied. The false-alarm probability implies how many noise-only samples are wrongly classified as outliers, and typically it should be smaller than some upper limit. The noise distribution parameters are not known a priori and have to be estimated. Multiple outliers have a strong influence to that estimation and may lead to uncontrollable false-alarm probability. The false-alarm probability control can be improved by robust estimators and/or by forward-detection methods. In this article, the false-alarm probability of the forward methods is analyzed. The forward consecutive mean excision (FCME) algorithm is enhanced to allow better false-alarm control. It is proposed that the forward method using the cell-averaging (CA) constant false-alarm rate (CFAR) technique can be applied for locating the outliers. The results show that its false-alarm probability stays close to the required value even in the presence of multiple outliers.
ISSN:1053-587X
1941-0476
DOI:10.1109/TSP.2007.896239