Loading…
CFAR Outlier Detection With Forward Methods
Separation or classification of signal-present samples from noise-only samples is studied. The false-alarm probability implies how many noise-only samples are wrongly classified as outliers, and typically it should be smaller than some upper limit. The noise distribution parameters are not known a p...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on signal processing 2007-09, Vol.55 (9), p.4702-4706 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Separation or classification of signal-present samples from noise-only samples is studied. The false-alarm probability implies how many noise-only samples are wrongly classified as outliers, and typically it should be smaller than some upper limit. The noise distribution parameters are not known a priori and have to be estimated. Multiple outliers have a strong influence to that estimation and may lead to uncontrollable false-alarm probability. The false-alarm probability control can be improved by robust estimators and/or by forward-detection methods. In this article, the false-alarm probability of the forward methods is analyzed. The forward consecutive mean excision (FCME) algorithm is enhanced to allow better false-alarm control. It is proposed that the forward method using the cell-averaging (CA) constant false-alarm rate (CFAR) technique can be applied for locating the outliers. The results show that its false-alarm probability stays close to the required value even in the presence of multiple outliers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-587X 1941-0476 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TSP.2007.896239 |